Past Consideration
1. Introduction
Past
consideration refers to a
situation where something is promised in return for something that has already
been done or provided. In contract law, past consideration is not legally
valid to support a contract because consideration must be contemporaneous
with the promise, i.e., it must be given in exchange for the promise made.
📌 Definition: According to Section
25(1) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, "an agreement made without
consideration is void, unless it is a promise to pay a debt which is barred by
limitation law or is made by a written agreement." However, past
consideration is not recognized as valid, since it does not provide a
mutual exchange at the time the promise is made.
📌 Abbreviation & Meaning:
- Past Consideration (P.C.): A benefit or detriment that has already
been received before the contract was made.
- Present Consideration: A benefit or detriment exchanged
simultaneously with the promise.
- Future Consideration: A benefit or detriment that will be
given in exchange for a promise made.
2. Explanation
For consideration to be valid in a
contract, it must meet the following criteria:
✅ Present or Future Exchange –
Consideration must be given at the time of making the contract or in the
future.
✅
Not Past – Anything done before the promise is made does not count as
valid consideration.
✅
Adequate and Lawful – Consideration must be something of value, but it
need not be equal in value to the promise.
💡 Example:
A agrees to help B with a task. Later, A promises to pay B for the task already
completed. This is past consideration and not enforceable under Indian
contract law because the promise was made after the work had been done.
3. Significance
in Real Life
- Business Agreements – Businesses need to ensure that
consideration is contemporaneous to avoid disputes about whether promises
are enforceable.
- Personal Agreements – When offering rewards for past
actions, the promise is typically unenforceable.
- Employment Contracts – Past services or duties cannot be used
as valid consideration for future promises of pay or benefits.
Understanding the concept of past
consideration ensures that only valid, enforceable contracts are formed,
especially in commercial and personal agreements.
4. Case Example
📌 Case: Satish Chandra v. State Bank of
India (2010)
📌 Parties Involved:
- Plaintiff: Satish Chandra
- Defendant: State Bank of India
📌 Issue & Dispute:
Satish Chandra had provided a loan to the bank's employee as a favor. After
some time, the employee made a promise to repay the amount, but only after a
period of time had passed. Satish Chandra later sought enforcement of the
promise based on the employee’s assurance.
📌 Scenario Explanation:
- The promise to repay the loan was based
on past consideration (loan provided earlier).
- The employee made the promise after the
loan was already given, and Chandra sought to enforce the promise to repay
based on the earlier loan.
- Chandra argued that the promise was
enforceable despite the loan having been provided before the promise was
made.
📌 Verdict:
The Supreme Court of India ruled that past consideration is not
valid consideration to form an enforceable contract under Indian contract
law. Since the loan was given without a contemporaneous promise, the agreement
based on past consideration could not be enforced. The court clarified that
consideration must be given either contemporaneously with or after the promise
is made, but not before.
📌 Analysis:
- This case reinforces that past
consideration is not sufficient to create a valid and enforceable
contract.
- Lesson Learned: To make an enforceable agreement,
consideration must be contemporaneous with the promise, not based on prior
acts.
5. Conclusion
- Past consideration refers to actions or benefits that were
completed before a promise was made.
- It is not legally valid as
consideration in a contract because there is no contemporaneous exchange.
- Contracts require present or future
consideration for mutual benefit and enforceability.
- Courts recognize this principle to
prevent unfair or one-sided promises from being legally binding.
Comments
Post a Comment