Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Undue Influence

Undue Influence

1. Introduction

Undue influence occurs when one party in a contract unfairly influences the other, taking advantage of their position of power or trust to obtain an unfair advantage. This leads to an absence of free consent, making the contract voidable at the will of the weaker party.

📌 Definition: According to Section 16(1) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, undue influence is when “one party is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage in a contract.”

📌 Abbreviation & Meaning:

• Undue Influence (U.I.): The wrongful use of power or trust to manipulate another party into a contract.
• Coercion vs. Undue Influence:
• Coercion involves physical force or threats.
• Undue influence involves psychological pressure or misuse of trust.

---

2. Explanation

For undue influence to be proven, two conditions must exist:

✅ Dominance of Will – One party is in a superior position (e.g., guardian-minor, employer-employee, doctor-patient).
✅ Unfair Advantage – The stronger party benefits unfairly from the contract.

💡 Example:
A doctor convinces his ill patient to transfer all his property to him in exchange for treatment. The patient agrees due to his dependence on the doctor, making the contract voidable on grounds of undue influence.

---

3. Significance in Real Life

• Family Relationships – Parents, guardians, or elder siblings may exert undue influence in financial matters.
• Business Transactions – Employers may pressure employees to sign unfair agreements.
• Medical & Legal Fields – Doctors or lawyers may exploit vulnerable clients for personal gain.
• Religious & Spiritual Influence – Spiritual leaders may influence followers to donate large sums of money unfairly.

Recognizing undue influence helps prevent exploitation and promotes fairness in contractual relationships.

---

4. Case Example

📌 Case: Mannu Singh v. Umadat Pande (1890)

📌 Parties Involved:

• Plaintiff: Mannu Singh
• Defendant: Umadat Pande (a priest)

📌 Issue & Dispute:
Mannu Singh, a devotee, gave a large sum of money and property to his priest under religious influence. Later, he claimed that the priest had exerted undue influence over him.

📌 Scenario Explanation:

• The priest was in a dominant position due to religious influence.
• The devotee trusted him blindly, which led to an unfair transfer of assets.
• The plaintiff argued that he was influenced into making the donation.

📌 Verdict:
The court ruled that since the contract was made under undue influence, it was voidable at the option of the plaintiff.

📌 Analysis:

• This case highlights that spiritual or authoritative influence can make a contract voidable.
• Lesson Learned: Contracts should be made with free and independent consent, without manipulation by an authoritative figure.

---

5. Conclusion

• Undue influence occurs when a stronger party manipulates a weaker one into a contract.
• It applies to relationships of trust and authority (e.g., doctor-patient, teacher-student).
• The contract becomes voidable if the weaker party proves unfair advantage.
• Courts recognize undue influence to prevent exploitation and ensure fairness in agreements.