Skip to main content

Family Law 1 - Assignment 2 - Part B - Law relating to Talaq

 Law Relating to Talaq in India: An In-Depth Analysis with Recent Case Example

Introduction

In India, "Talaq" refers to the Islamic practice of divorce, permitting a Muslim man to dissolve his marriage by pronouncing "talaq," meaning "I divorce you." Historically, this could be executed unilaterally and, in some cases, instantaneously through "triple talaq." However, legal reforms and judicial interventions have significantly transformed the practice of Talaq in India.

Types of Talaq

  1. Talaq-e-Sunnat: This is the approved form of divorce, adhering to the traditions of Prophet Muhammad. It includes:

    • Talaq-e-Ahsan: A single pronouncement of divorce during a wife's tuhr (period of purity between menstruations), followed by abstinence from conjugal relations during the iddat period (waiting period). If no reconciliation occurs during iddat, the divorce becomes final.
    • Talaq-e-Hasan: Pronouncement of divorce in three successive tuhrs, with no intercourse during these periods. The divorce becomes irrevocable after the third pronouncement.
  2. Talaq-e-Biddat (Triple Talaq): An instant and irrevocable divorce pronounced thrice in one sitting. This form has been a subject of extensive legal scrutiny and has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of India.

Legal Framework Governing Talaq

  1. Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937: This Act governs marriage, divorce, and other personal matters among Muslims in India. It recognizes Talaq as a legitimate form of divorce.

  2. Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939: This Act provides Muslim women the right to seek divorce under specific circumstances, such as the husband's disappearance, failure to provide maintenance, imprisonment, impotence, insanity, cruelty, or other valid grounds recognized under Muslim law.

  3. The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019: Enacted following the Supreme Court's verdict declaring triple talaq unconstitutional, this Act criminalizes the practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat). Key provisions include:

    • Section 3: Declares pronouncement of triple talaq void and illegal.
    • Section 4: Prescribes punishment for pronouncing triple talaq, including imprisonment for up to three years and a fine.
    • Section 5: Entitles the married Muslim woman to seek subsistence allowance from her husband for herself and dependent children.
    • Section 6: Grants the woman custody of her minor children in the event of pronouncement of triple talaq.

Judicial Pronouncements

  • Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017): In this landmark case, the Supreme Court examined whether triple talaq has constitutional protection under Article 25(1), which guarantees the fundamental right to "profess, practice, and propagate religion." The Court sought to determine if triple talaq is an essential feature of Islamic belief and practice.

    The bench, comprising Chief Justice J.S. Khehar (a Sikh), and Justices Kurian Joseph (a Christian), R.F. Nariman (a Parsi), U.U. Lalit (a Hindu), and S. Abdul Nazeer (a Muslim), delivered a 397-page ruling. While two judges upheld the validity of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat), the three other judges held it unconstitutional, thus barring the practice by a 3–2 majority. One judge argued that instant triple talaq violated Islamic law.

    The Court asked the central government to promulgate legislation within six months to govern marriage and divorce in the Muslim community. It stated that until the government formulates a law regarding instant triple talaq, there would be an injunction against husbands pronouncing instant triple talaq on their wives.

Recent Case Example

  • Supreme Court's Observation on Talaq-e-Hasan (2022): A bench of the Supreme Court of India stated that the practice of divorce for Muslim men through "Talaq-e-Hasan," which is pronounced once a month over a period of three months, is permissible. The Court also noted that a Muslim woman can part ways with her husband through "khula," a form of mutually agreed divorce.

Conclusion

The practice of Talaq in India has undergone significant reforms to align with constitutional principles of equality and justice. The abolition of instant triple talaq and provisions empowering Muslim women reflect a progressive shift towards safeguarding women's rights within the framework of Islamic law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Agreement

Agreement  1. Introduction An agreement is a mutual understanding between two or more parties regarding their rights and obligations. It is the foundation of a contract and is formed when one party makes an offer and the other accepts it. 📌 Definition : According to Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , an agreement is “every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning : Agreement (Agrmt.) : A negotiated and legally recognized understanding between parties. Contract vs. Agreement : Every contract is an agreement, but not all agreements are contracts. A contract becomes legally enforceable, whereas an agreement may or may not have legal binding. 2. Explanation For an agreement to be valid, it must include: ✅ Offer and Acceptance – One party must make an offer, and the other must accept it. ✅ Consideration – Something of value must be exchanged. ✅ Mutual Consent...

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Voidable Contract

Voidable Contract 1. Introduction A voidable contract is a valid contract that one or both parties can either enforce or void due to certain legal defects. Unlike a void contract, which is unenforceable from the beginning, a voidable contract remains valid until it is legally rescinded by the affected party. 📌 Definition: According to Section 2(i) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a voidable contract is “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties, but not at the option of the other(s).” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning: Voidable Contract (V.C.): A contract that is initially valid but can be canceled under specific conditions. Void vs. Voidable: A void contract is legally unenforceable, whereas a voidable contract is enforceable unless the aggrieved party chooses to rescind it. 2. Explanation A contract may become voidable due to the following factors: ✅ Coercion – If one party forces the other to enter the cont...