Skip to main content

Discretion in Administrative Law

Discretion in Administrative Law


🔷 Meaning of Discretion

  • Discretion means freedom to choose between different options or actions based on judgment and circumstances.

  • In Administrative Law, discretion refers to the power given to government officials or authorities to make decisions as they think fit, within legal limits.

📌 Example:
A licensing officer may have the discretion to approve or reject an application based on public interest.


🔷 Need for Administrative Discretion

In modern welfare states, the government performs many functions — like granting licenses, giving subsidies, issuing permits, and enforcing rules. It is not possible to write laws for every small detail. So, discretion is given to administrators to handle:

  1. Complex, dynamic situations

  2. Public welfare schemes

  3. Emergencies and urgent matters

  4. Individual-based decisions


🔷 Constitutional Validity of Discretion

  • Discretion is valid as long as it is reasonable, fair, and non-arbitrary.

  • It should not violate Article 14 (Right to Equality), which forbids arbitrary or discriminatory actions.


🔷 Types of Administrative Discretion

🔹 1. Statutory Discretion

  • Given by statutes/laws.

  • Example: Granting bail under CrPC by a magistrate.

🔹 2. Discretionary Powers in Rule-making

  • Power to create rules or regulations under an Act.

  • Example: Rules under the Environmental Protection Act, 1986.

🔹 3. Discretion in Administrative Actions

  • Taken in specific cases based on circumstances.

  • Example: Suspending a government employee during investigation.


🔷 Judicial Control Over Discretion

The judiciary ensures that discretion is not misused. Courts interfere if:

  • There is malafide intention (bad faith)

  • The decision is irrational or unjust

  • Authority exceeds its powers (ultra vires)

  • There is violation of fundamental rights


🔷 Misuse of Discretion

Discretion must be used to promote public interest, not personal or political gain.

❌ Common Misuses:

  1. Malafide (bad intention)

    • Using power for personal revenge or favor.

  2. Irrelevant considerations

    • Deciding based on things unrelated to law.

  3. Non-application of mind

    • Taking decisions mechanically or blindly.

  4. Acting under dictation

    • Not using one’s own judgment but following someone else’s orders.

  5. Discrimination

    • Treating people unequally without a valid reason.


🔷 Important Doctrines Related to Discretion

🔸 1. Doctrine of Reasonableness

  • All discretionary actions must be reasonable, not arbitrary.

🔸 2. Doctrine of Proportionality

  • Action must be proportionate to the situation.

🔸 3. Wednesbury Principle (UK Law)

  • A decision is invalid if it is so unreasonable that no sensible person would have taken it.


🔷 Leading Case Laws

📌 State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh (1980)

  • Land acquisition for personal benefit = misuse of discretion.

  • Held: Public interest must be genuine, not an excuse.

📌 Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)

  • Her passport was impounded without giving reasons.

  • Held: Discretion must be guided, and reasons must be recorded.

  • Introduced concept of fair procedure under Article 21.

📌 Ram Jawaya v. State of Punjab (1955)

  • Explained executive power and its limits.

  • Discretion is legal only when supported by law.

📌 Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhatija v. Collector (1989)

  • High Court said discretion must be used judiciously and not arbitrarily.


🔷 How to Control Abuse of Discretion?

  1. Legislative Control

    • Parliament can frame clearer laws and impose limits on discretion.

  2. Judicial Control

    • Courts check misuse through writs like Mandamus, Certiorari.

  3. Administrative Guidelines

    • Government can issue detailed rules and manuals for officers.

  4. Transparency and Accountability

    • Giving reasons for decisions increases fairness.


🔷 Importance of Discretion

✅ Helps in dealing with dynamic, practical situations
✅ Gives flexibility in governance
✅ Supports public interest, welfare, and justice
✅ Must be used with care and accountability


🔷 Conclusion

Discretion is an important tool for good governance, but it is also dangerous if misused. In a democracy, rule of law must be followed. Courts, legislature, and civil society must keep a check to ensure discretion is used for justice, not injustice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Agreement

Agreement  1. Introduction An agreement is a mutual understanding between two or more parties regarding their rights and obligations. It is the foundation of a contract and is formed when one party makes an offer and the other accepts it. 📌 Definition : According to Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , an agreement is “every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning : Agreement (Agrmt.) : A negotiated and legally recognized understanding between parties. Contract vs. Agreement : Every contract is an agreement, but not all agreements are contracts. A contract becomes legally enforceable, whereas an agreement may or may not have legal binding. 2. Explanation For an agreement to be valid, it must include: ✅ Offer and Acceptance – One party must make an offer, and the other must accept it. ✅ Consideration – Something of value must be exchanged. ✅ Mutual Consent...

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Voidable Contract

Voidable Contract 1. Introduction A voidable contract is a valid contract that one or both parties can either enforce or void due to certain legal defects. Unlike a void contract, which is unenforceable from the beginning, a voidable contract remains valid until it is legally rescinded by the affected party. 📌 Definition: According to Section 2(i) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a voidable contract is “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties, but not at the option of the other(s).” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning: Voidable Contract (V.C.): A contract that is initially valid but can be canceled under specific conditions. Void vs. Voidable: A void contract is legally unenforceable, whereas a voidable contract is enforceable unless the aggrieved party chooses to rescind it. 2. Explanation A contract may become voidable due to the following factors: ✅ Coercion – If one party forces the other to enter the cont...