Skip to main content

Pardoning Power of President

Pardoning Power of the President of India

1. Introduction

The Pardoning Power vested in the President of India is a significant constitutional provision aimed at ensuring justice and mercy. Outlined in Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, this power allows the President to grant clemency in certain cases, providing a mechanism to correct potential judicial errors or to show compassion in deserving situations.

The Indian Constitution vests the President with the authority to grant pardons and other forms of clemency to individuals convicted of offences. This power serves as a vital component of the justice system, providing a mechanism to rectify judicial errors, offer relief in cases of undue hardship, and uphold the principles of mercy and humanity.

2. Constitutional Provision: Article 72

Article 72 of the Constitution of India delineates the scope of the President's pardoning powers:

(1) The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence.

    (a) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a Court Martial;

    (b) in all cases where the punishment or sentence is for an offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;

    (c) in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.

This provision empowers the President to intervene in specific cases, ensuring justice is tempered with mercy.

Article 72 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to grant:

  • Pardon: Completely absolves the individual of the offense, treating them as if they were never convicted.

  • Reprieve: Temporarily suspends the execution of a sentence, especially in death penalty cases, to allow time for reconsideration or appeal.

  • Respite: Reduces the severity of the punishment due to special circumstances, such as the convict's health condition.

  • Remission: Lowers the amount of punishment without changing its nature, for example, reducing a sentence from ten years to five years.

  • Commutation: Substitutes a lighter form of punishment for a harsher one, like changing a death sentence to life imprisonment.

These powers can be exercised in the following situations:

  • Court Martial Cases: Offenses tried by military courts.

  • Union Law Offenses: Crimes committed under laws relating to matters within the Union's jurisdiction.

  • Death Sentence Cases: Convictions where the sentence is capital punishment.

3. Scope and Limitations

  • Before or After Conviction: The President can exercise this power before or after a conviction, offering a chance for mercy or correction.

  • Advice of Council of Ministers: While the Constitution doesn't explicitly state, it's understood that the President exercises this power based on the advice of the Union Cabinet.

  • Judicial Review: The exercise of this power is subject to judicial review to ensure it isn't arbitrary or unreasonable.

4. Significance of the Pardoning Power

  • Correcting Judicial Errors: Provides a mechanism to rectify possible miscarriages of justice.

  • Humanitarian Considerations: Allows for compassion in cases involving special circumstances.

  • Checks and Balances: Acts as a check on the judiciary, ensuring that justice is served in a fair and balanced manner.

Comparison with Governor's Powers

Article 161 of the Constitution grants similar clemency powers to the Governors of states:

The Governor of a State shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the State extends.

However, the Governor's powers do not extend to cases involving court-martial sentences or death sentences, which fall exclusively under the President's jurisdiction.

5. Judicial Oversight

The Supreme Court has held that while the President's pardoning power is discretionary, it is not absolute. The Court can review the exercise of this power to ensure it aligns with constitutional principles and isn't exercised arbitrarily. This ensures a balance between executive discretion and judicial accountability.

6. Case Study: Maru Ram v. Union of India (1980)

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court emphasized that the President's pardoning power must be exercised fairly and reasonably. The Court held that arbitrary use of this power could be subject to judicial review, reinforcing the principle that executive actions must adhere to constitutional norms.

7. Conclusion

The Pardoning Power of the President of India is a crucial aspect of the constitutional framework, serving as a tool for justice and mercy. While it provides an avenue for correcting judicial errors and showing compassion, its exercise is also subject to judicial oversight to prevent misuse and ensure fairness. This balance upholds the principles of justice and the rule of law in the Indian democratic system.

References:

  • Constitution of India – Article 72

  • Drishti IAS – Pardoning Power of President(Drishti IAS)

  • BYJU'S – Pardoning Power of President

  • Indian Kanoon – Article 72(Indian Kanoon)

  • De Facto IAS – Pardoning Power of President(De Facto Law)

  • Drishti Judiciary – Pardoning Power of President

  • NEXT IAS – Pardoning Power of President

  • Wikipedia – Pardoning Power of President of India

  • Constitution of India – Article 72(NEHU)

  • Drishti Judiciary – Pardoning Power of the President(Drishti Judiciary)

  • BYJU'S – Pardoning Power of President(BYJU'S)

  • Chahal Academy – Pardoning Power of President(Chahal Academy)

  • Wikipedia – Pardon(Wikipedia)


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personal Injury

Introduction The concept of Personal Injury is one of the most important topics under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 (formerly known as the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923). This Act was enacted by the Indian Parliament to provide financial protection to workers who suffer injuries during the course of their employment. The Act makes it a legal duty of the employer to pay compensation to his employees when they suffer a personal injury caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. Meaning of Personal Injury The term "personal injury" is not directly defined in the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, but it has been interpreted widely by Indian courts over the years. In simple terms, personal injury means any bodily harm caused to a workman as a result of an accident that happens while he is doing his job. Personal injury includes: Physical injuries such as broken bones, burns, or loss of limbs Injuries to internal organs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Contract of Indemnity

Contract of Indemnity Introduction In daily life and business activities, risks and losses are common. To manage these risks, people often enter into agreements where one promises to protect the other from potential losses. In law, such an agreement is called a Contract of Indemnity . It plays an important role in building trust between individuals, businesses, and institutions. This concept is especially important in sectors like insurance, agency work, and business contracts. The Contract of Indemnity is governed under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , specifically under Section 124 . Definition According to Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 : "A contract of indemnity is a contract by which one party promises to save the other from any loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any other person." In simple words, a contract of indemnity means one person promising to compensate another person for the losses suffered ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain the Reforms in Law — GST

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is undoubtedly the most significant tax reform in India since independence. It was introduced on 1st July, 2017 through the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 , which amended the Constitution of India to enable the levy of GST. GST replaced a complex, multi-layered system of indirect taxes with a single, unified, comprehensive tax on the supply of goods and services throughout India. It is often described as "One Nation, One Tax, One Market" — reflecting its transformative impact on India's taxation system. GST is a destination-based consumption tax levied on the value added at each stage of the supply chain. It is collected at every stage of production and distribution but the tax burden ultimately falls on the final consumer . Businesses that collect GST from their customers can claim credit for the GST they have already paid on their inputs — this is called the Input Tax Credit (ITC) mechanism, which is the ...
Post a Comment
Read more