Precedent (in Jurisprudence)
🔷 What is Precedent?
-
The word “precedent” comes from Latin “praecedere” which means “to go before.”
-
In law, a precedent means a past judicial decision that is followed in future similar cases.
“A precedent is a decision of a court which is used as an example in deciding later similar cases.”
🔶 Definition
According to Keeton:
“A judicial precedent is a judicial decision which contains in itself a principle.”
According to Salmond:
“Precedent is a judicial decision which is authoritative and binding.”
🔷 Why is Precedent Important?
-
Ensures Uniformity – Same laws are applied in similar cases.
-
Provides Certainty – People know how the law works.
-
Guides Judges – Judges can refer to earlier decisions.
-
Develops Law – Courts help in making and evolving law.
-
Saves Time – No need to rethink everything from the beginning.
🔶 Types of Precedent
1. Authoritative Precedent
-
Must be followed by lower courts.
-
Binding in nature.
-
Example: A Supreme Court judgment must be followed by High Courts.
2. Persuasive Precedent
-
Not binding but can be followed.
-
Used for guidance or reference.
-
Example: A High Court’s decision used in another state.
Based on How They Are Used:
3. Original Precedent
-
When a new principle of law is established for the first time.
4. Declaratory Precedent
-
Declares or explains an existing rule of law.
5. Distinguished Precedent
-
When a court decides not to follow a precedent because the facts are different.
🔷 Doctrine of Stare Decisis
Latin: “Stare decisis et non quieta movere” – "To stand by what is decided."
-
It is the principle that courts must follow earlier decisions in similar cases.
-
Provides stability and consistency in the legal system.
🔶 Ratio Decidendi vs Obiter Dicta
Ratio Decidendi | Obiter Dicta |
---|---|
Legal reason for the decision | Extra opinion or remark |
Binding | Not binding |
Used as precedent | Only persuasive |
✳️ Example:
If a judge says, “A person who commits theft is punishable under law,” that’s Ratio.
If he adds, “All thefts usually happen at night,” that’s Obiter.
🔹 Hierarchy of Courts in India (For Precedent)
-
Supreme Court of India – Highest court. Its decisions are binding on all.
-
High Courts – Bind all lower courts in their state.
-
District and Subordinate Courts – Must follow High Court and Supreme Court rulings.
🔷 Binding Nature of Supreme Court Decisions
-
Article 141 of Indian Constitution:
“The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.”
🔶 When Precedents Are Not Followed
-
Overruled – A higher court finds a previous decision wrong and cancels it.
-
Distinguished – Court finds facts of the case are different.
-
Per Incuriam – A decision made ignoring a law or earlier binding precedent.
-
Conflicting Judgments – If two decisions of equal strength exist, courts choose one.
🔷 Merits of Precedent
-
Certainty in law
-
Efficiency – Saves time.
-
Justice – Equal treatment.
-
Growth of law – New judgments add new principles.
🔶 Demerits of Precedent
-
Rigid – May stop growth of law.
-
Complex – Too many cases to refer.
-
Confusing – If conflicting judgments exist.
-
Delays – Lawyers and judges spend too much time finding cases.
🔷 Important Case Laws
✅ Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) – UK Case
-
Established the concept of duty of care in negligence law.
✅ Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
-
Laid down Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution.
-
Binding on all courts.
✅ State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)
-
Explained the limits of judicial review.
🔶 Precedent vs Legislation
Precedent | Legislation |
---|---|
Made by judges | Made by parliament |
Based on case facts | Based on general rules |
Evolves slowly | Can be changed quickly |
More flexible | More rigid |
🔷 Conclusion
-
Precedent is a powerful source of law in common law systems like India.
-
It maintains justice, uniformity, and stability in the legal system.
-
However, courts must also be flexible and consider changing times.
-
Judges must balance between following old judgments and making new interpretations to keep law updated.
Comments
Post a Comment