Skip to main content

Precedent in Jurisprudence

Precedent (in Jurisprudence)


🔷 What is Precedent?

  • The word “precedent” comes from Latin “praecedere” which means “to go before.”

  • In law, a precedent means a past judicial decision that is followed in future similar cases.

“A precedent is a decision of a court which is used as an example in deciding later similar cases.”


🔶 Definition

According to Keeton:

“A judicial precedent is a judicial decision which contains in itself a principle.”

According to Salmond:

“Precedent is a judicial decision which is authoritative and binding.”


🔷 Why is Precedent Important?

  1. Ensures Uniformity – Same laws are applied in similar cases.

  2. Provides Certainty – People know how the law works.

  3. Guides Judges – Judges can refer to earlier decisions.

  4. Develops Law – Courts help in making and evolving law.

  5. Saves Time – No need to rethink everything from the beginning.


🔶 Types of Precedent

1. Authoritative Precedent

  • Must be followed by lower courts.

  • Binding in nature.

  • Example: A Supreme Court judgment must be followed by High Courts.

2. Persuasive Precedent

  • Not binding but can be followed.

  • Used for guidance or reference.

  • Example: A High Court’s decision used in another state.


Based on How They Are Used:

3. Original Precedent

  • When a new principle of law is established for the first time.

4. Declaratory Precedent

  • Declares or explains an existing rule of law.

5. Distinguished Precedent

  • When a court decides not to follow a precedent because the facts are different.


🔷 Doctrine of Stare Decisis

Latin: “Stare decisis et non quieta movere” – "To stand by what is decided."

  • It is the principle that courts must follow earlier decisions in similar cases.

  • Provides stability and consistency in the legal system.


🔶 Ratio Decidendi vs Obiter Dicta

Ratio Decidendi Obiter Dicta
Legal reason for the decision Extra opinion or remark
Binding Not binding
Used as precedent Only persuasive

✳️ Example:

If a judge says, “A person who commits theft is punishable under law,” that’s Ratio.
If he adds, “All thefts usually happen at night,” that’s Obiter.


🔹 Hierarchy of Courts in India (For Precedent)

  1. Supreme Court of India – Highest court. Its decisions are binding on all.

  2. High Courts – Bind all lower courts in their state.

  3. District and Subordinate Courts – Must follow High Court and Supreme Court rulings.


🔷 Binding Nature of Supreme Court Decisions

  • Article 141 of Indian Constitution:

“The law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.”


🔶 When Precedents Are Not Followed

  1. Overruled – A higher court finds a previous decision wrong and cancels it.

  2. Distinguished – Court finds facts of the case are different.

  3. Per Incuriam – A decision made ignoring a law or earlier binding precedent.

  4. Conflicting Judgments – If two decisions of equal strength exist, courts choose one.


🔷 Merits of Precedent

  1. Certainty in law

  2. Efficiency – Saves time.

  3. Justice – Equal treatment.

  4. Growth of law – New judgments add new principles.


🔶 Demerits of Precedent

  1. Rigid – May stop growth of law.

  2. Complex – Too many cases to refer.

  3. Confusing – If conflicting judgments exist.

  4. Delays – Lawyers and judges spend too much time finding cases.


🔷 Important Case Laws

Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) – UK Case

  • Established the concept of duty of care in negligence law.

Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

  • Laid down Basic Structure Doctrine of the Indian Constitution.

  • Binding on all courts.

State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)

  • Explained the limits of judicial review.


🔶 Precedent vs Legislation

Precedent Legislation
Made by judges Made by parliament
Based on case facts Based on general rules
Evolves slowly Can be changed quickly
More flexible More rigid

🔷 Conclusion

  • Precedent is a powerful source of law in common law systems like India.

  • It maintains justice, uniformity, and stability in the legal system.

  • However, courts must also be flexible and consider changing times.

  • Judges must balance between following old judgments and making new interpretations to keep law updated.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Agreement

Agreement  1. Introduction An agreement is a mutual understanding between two or more parties regarding their rights and obligations. It is the foundation of a contract and is formed when one party makes an offer and the other accepts it. 📌 Definition : According to Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , an agreement is “every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning : Agreement (Agrmt.) : A negotiated and legally recognized understanding between parties. Contract vs. Agreement : Every contract is an agreement, but not all agreements are contracts. A contract becomes legally enforceable, whereas an agreement may or may not have legal binding. 2. Explanation For an agreement to be valid, it must include: ✅ Offer and Acceptance – One party must make an offer, and the other must accept it. ✅ Consideration – Something of value must be exchanged. ✅ Mutual Consent...

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Voidable Contract

Voidable Contract 1. Introduction A voidable contract is a valid contract that one or both parties can either enforce or void due to certain legal defects. Unlike a void contract, which is unenforceable from the beginning, a voidable contract remains valid until it is legally rescinded by the affected party. 📌 Definition: According to Section 2(i) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a voidable contract is “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties, but not at the option of the other(s).” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning: Voidable Contract (V.C.): A contract that is initially valid but can be canceled under specific conditions. Void vs. Voidable: A void contract is legally unenforceable, whereas a voidable contract is enforceable unless the aggrieved party chooses to rescind it. 2. Explanation A contract may become voidable due to the following factors: ✅ Coercion – If one party forces the other to enter the cont...