Skip to main content

Marshalling

The Doctrine of Marshalling is an equitable principle of property law that dictates the order in which a secured creditor must realize (recover) their debt from multiple properties, primarily to protect the rights of a subsequent purchaser or a subsequent mortgagee who has fewer securities.

The term "marshalling" literally means "to arrange" or "to systematize" the available securities in a fair manner. In India, this doctrine is codified under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TPA) in two contexts:

  1. Marshalling by Subsequent Purchaser (Section 56)

  2. Marshalling by Subsequent Mortgagee (Section 81)


1. Marshalling by Subsequent Purchaser (Section 56)

This rule protects a person who buys a mortgaged property without the specific knowledge or agreement of being solely liable for the debt.

A. The Rule

Section 56 applies when:

  1. The owner of two or more properties mortgages them all to one person (the prior mortgagee).

  2. The owner then sells one or more of these properties to another person (the subsequent purchaser).

In this scenario, the buyer (subsequent purchaser) is entitled to require the prior mortgagee to satisfy the mortgage debt out of the property or properties that were not sold to the buyer, as far as those properties will extend.

B. Illustrative Example (Section 56)

  • Facts: Ramesh mortgages two properties, Plot A and Plot B, to Bank X for a loan of ₹50 Lakhs. Later, Ramesh sells Plot B to Suresh.

  • Default: Ramesh defaults on the loan. Bank X has the right to sell both Plot A and Plot B.

  • Marshalling Right: Suresh (the buyer of Plot B) can exercise the right of marshalling, demanding that Bank X must first sell Plot A (the property not sold to Suresh).

  • Outcome: Only if the sale proceeds from Plot A are insufficient to cover the ₹50 Lakh debt can Bank X proceed against Plot B.

C. Conditions for Application (Section 56)

  1. Common Owner/Mortgagor: There must be a single owner/mortgagor who mortgages two or more properties.

  2. Prior Mortgage: All properties must be subject to a prior mortgage taken by one person.

  3. Subsequent Sale: The mortgagor must subsequently sell one or more of the properties to a third party.

  4. No Prejudice: The marshalling must not prejudice the rights of the prior mortgagee (Bank X must still be able to recover its full debt).


2. Marshalling by Subsequent Mortgagee (Section 81)

This rule applies the same equitable principle when the contest is between two secured creditors (mortgagees) rather than a creditor and a purchaser.

A. The Rule

Section 81 applies when:

  1. The owner mortgages two or more properties (Property X and Property Y) to a first mortgagee (Creditor A).

  2. The owner then mortgages only one of those properties (Property X) to a second mortgagee (Creditor B).

The subsequent mortgagee (Creditor B) is entitled to require that the first mortgagee (Creditor A) satisfy their debt out of the property not mortgaged to Creditor B (Property Y), as far as that property will extend.

B. Illustrative Example (Section 81)

  • Facts: Ajay mortgages Plot A and Plot B to Bank X (First Mortgagee) for ₹70 Lakhs. Later, Ajay mortgages only Plot B to Bank Y (Second Mortgagee) for ₹20 Lakhs.

  • Marshalling Right: Bank Y (secured only by Plot B) can compel Bank X (secured by both A and B) to first recover its ₹70 Lakhs debt from Plot A.

  • Outcome: This protects Plot B, ensuring that the second mortgagee (Bank Y) has a clearer path to recover its ₹20 Lakhs debt from Plot B.


3. Marshalling vs. Contribution (Section 82)

The Doctrine of Marshalling is often confused with the Doctrine of Contribution (Section 82, TPA), but they are distinct equitable rights:

AspectMarshalling (Section 56 & 81)Contribution (Section 82)
PurposeProtection of a subsequent interest holder(purchaser or mortgagee).Equitable distribution of a shared burdenamong co-mortgagors.
PrinciplePrevents a creditor with two funds from arbitrarily destroying the security of a creditor/purchaser with only one fund.Ensures multiple mortgagors/properties contribute rateably (proportionately) to discharge a common mortgage debt.
ApplicabilityRequires one debtor, but two or more creditors (or a buyer).Applies between co-mortgagors (multiple owners) who have mortgaged their distinct properties for a common debt.
HierarchyMarshalling supersedes Contribution (last paragraph of Section 82).Contribution is subject to marshalling.

The precedence of marshalling ensures that the subsequent creditor's specific right to an equitable arrangement prevails over the general right of co-debtors to share the burden equally.


4. Conclusion

The Doctrine of Marshalling, codified in Sections 56 and 81 of the TPA, 1882, is a statutory rule of equity designed to prevent arbitrary action by a senior creditor holding multiple securities. By directing the order of debt recovery, it preserves the residual value of the mortgaged property for subsequent purchasers or mortgagees, thus upholding fairness and promoting commercial certainty in property transactions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Agreement

Agreement  1. Introduction An agreement is a mutual understanding between two or more parties regarding their rights and obligations. It is the foundation of a contract and is formed when one party makes an offer and the other accepts it. 📌 Definition : According to Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 , an agreement is “every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning : Agreement (Agrmt.) : A negotiated and legally recognized understanding between parties. Contract vs. Agreement : Every contract is an agreement, but not all agreements are contracts. A contract becomes legally enforceable, whereas an agreement may or may not have legal binding. 2. Explanation For an agreement to be valid, it must include: ✅ Offer and Acceptance – One party must make an offer, and the other must accept it. ✅ Consideration – Something of value must be exchanged. ✅ Mutual Consent...

Contracts 1-Assignment 1-Part A - Voidable Contract

Voidable Contract 1. Introduction A voidable contract is a valid contract that one or both parties can either enforce or void due to certain legal defects. Unlike a void contract, which is unenforceable from the beginning, a voidable contract remains valid until it is legally rescinded by the affected party. 📌 Definition: According to Section 2(i) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a voidable contract is “an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties, but not at the option of the other(s).” 📌 Abbreviation & Meaning: Voidable Contract (V.C.): A contract that is initially valid but can be canceled under specific conditions. Void vs. Voidable: A void contract is legally unenforceable, whereas a voidable contract is enforceable unless the aggrieved party chooses to rescind it. 2. Explanation A contract may become voidable due to the following factors: ✅ Coercion – If one party forces the other to enter the cont...