Introduction
The concepts of Agnates and Cognates are important categories of heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. They come into play in the succession to the property of a Hindu male who dies intestate (without a Will) when there are no Class I heirs, Class II heirs, or other closer relatives. These concepts are rooted in ancient Hindu law and have been codified and modernized under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Meaning of Agnates — Section 3(a)
Under Section 3(a) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a person is said to be an agnate of another if the two are related by blood or adoption wholly through males.
In simple terms, an agnate is a person whose relationship with the deceased passes only through male links — there is no female link in the chain of relationship.
Examples of Agnates:
- Father's brother — relationship through father (male) → grandfather (male) → great-grandfather (male). All male links. So father's brother is an agnate.
- Father's brother's son — relationship through father (male) → grandfather (male). All male links. Agnate.
- Son's son — relationship through son (male). Agnate.
- Brother — relationship through father (male). Agnate.
Meaning of Cognates — Section 3(c)
Under Section 3(c) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a person is said to be a cognate of another if the two are related by blood or adoption but not wholly through males — i.e., there is at least one female link in the chain of relationship.
In simple terms, a cognate is a relative where at least one woman appears in the chain connecting the deceased to that relative.
Examples of Cognates:
- Mother's brother — relationship through mother (female). Female link exists. Cognate.
- Sister's son — relationship through sister (female). Female link exists. Cognate.
- Daughter's son — relationship through daughter (female). Female link exists. Cognate.
- Father's sister's son — relationship through father's sister (female). Female link exists. Cognate.
Order of Succession
Under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, the order of succession to the property of a Hindu male dying intestate is:
- Class I heirs (highest priority)
- Class II heirs
- Agnates
- Cognates
- Government (escheat — last resort)
Agnates come before cognates in the order of succession. This means that if any agnate is alive, no cognate gets anything.
Rules for Preferring Among Agnates and Cognates — Section 12
When there are multiple agnates (or cognates) claiming succession, the following rules determine who gets preference:
Rule 1 — Lineal Descendants Preferred Of two heirs, the one who has only lineal descendants in the line of relationship is preferred. For example, a person related through son's son is preferred over one related through son's brother.
Rule 2 — Fewer Degrees Preferred Of two heirs related in the same manner, the one with fewer degrees of relationship is preferred.
Calculating Degrees:
- Each generation upward from the deceased counts as one degree
- Each generation downward counts as one degree
Example: Father's brother's son is related in 3 degrees (deceased → father = 1 degree up; father → grandfather = 1 degree up; grandfather → father's brother = 1 degree down; father's brother → father's brother's son = 1 degree down = 4 degrees total).
Rule 3 — Equal Degrees Share Equally If two or more agnates (or cognates) are of equal degree, they share the property equally.
Difference Between Agnates and Cognates
| Agnates | Cognates |
|---|---|
| Related only through males | Related through at least one female |
| Higher priority in succession | Lower priority — come after agnates |
| Defined under Section 3(a) | Defined under Section 3(c) |
| Example: Father's brother | Example: Mother's brother |
| Ancient concept — paternal side | Includes maternal side relatives |
Important Case Laws
1. Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh (2002) The Supreme Court held that the distinction between agnates and cognates under the Hindu Succession Act is a matter of statutory law and courts must apply it strictly as provided in the Act.
2. Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Chander Sen (1986) The Supreme Court discussed the concept of agnatic relationship in the context of Hindu joint family property and held that agnatic relationships are based on male descent.
Conclusion
The concepts of agnates and cognates provide a comprehensive safety net in the law of Hindu intestate succession, ensuring that the property of a deceased Hindu male always passes to some living relative rather than going to the government. While the distinction between agnates and cognates reflects ancient Hindu notions of patrilineal descent, the Hindu Succession Act has modernized these concepts by incorporating them into a clear, codified framework that provides certainty and predictability in matters of succession.
Comments
Post a Comment