The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (commonly known as the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 or the Land Acquisition Act, 2013) is the most significant reform in Indian land acquisition law since independence. It came into force on 1st January, 2014, replacing the century-old Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which had been widely criticized for being unfair to landowners and ignoring the needs of those displaced by land acquisition.
The 2013 Act was enacted with the following twin objectives:
- To ensure that landowners receive fair compensation when their land is acquired
- To ensure that those displaced by land acquisition receive adequate rehabilitation and resettlement
The Act embodies the constitutional values of social justice, rule of law, and protection of the rights of the poor and vulnerable — particularly farmers, landless labourers, and tribal communities.
Historical Background — Why the 1894 Act Was Replaced
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was enacted during British rule and had several serious deficiencies:
- Inadequate compensation — Compensation was based on the registered value of land (which was often much lower than the market value) and did not account for the replacement cost of land
- No rehabilitation — The 1894 Act had no provisions for the rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons
- Opaque process — The acquisition process was not transparent and gave landowners little opportunity to be heard
- No consent requirement — Land could be acquired without the consent of landowners
- Misuse of urgency clause — The urgency clause in the 1894 Act was widely misused to bypass even the limited procedural safeguards
- Forced displacement — Millions of people (mostly from rural, tribal, and marginalized communities) were displaced without adequate compensation or support
These deficiencies, combined with widespread public protests against land acquisition (particularly in cases like Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal), led to the enactment of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
Salient Features of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013
Feature 1 — Wider Definition of Public Purpose — Section 2(1)
The Act defines "public purpose" broadly to include:
- Strategic defence and security purposes
- Infrastructure projects (roads, railways, highways, ports, airports, power projects)
- Project affected persons' resettlement
- Planned development of rural and urban areas
- Industrial corridors
- Infrastructure and social infrastructure under PPP model
Importantly, the Act restricts land acquisition for private companies — land can only be acquired for private companies if the company has obtained the consent of 80% of the affected families and the project serves a public purpose.
Feature 2 — Mandatory Social Impact Assessment (SIA) — Section 4
Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is one of the most innovative features of the 2013 Act. Before any land acquisition can proceed, the appropriate government must carry out an SIA in consultation with the gram sabha (village assembly) or other local bodies.
The SIA must assess:
- The nature and extent of the proposed project
- The number of families likely to be displaced
- The social and economic impact on the affected area
- Whether the project can be carried out on less fertile or wasteland
- Whether the minimum land required is being acquired
The SIA report is examined by an Expert Group which can recommend whether the acquisition should proceed or not.
Exceptions to SIA: The SIA is not required for acquisitions under:
- The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act
- The Atomic Energy Act
- The Electricity Act (for certain emergency situations)
- Railway Act (for certain purposes)
Feature 3 — Consent Requirement
One of the most significant features of the 2013 Act is the requirement of consent from affected families for certain categories of acquisition:
- Private companies — Consent of 80% of affected families required
- PPP projects — Consent of 70% of affected families required
- Government projects — No consent required
Feature 4 — Fair Compensation — Sections 26 to 30
The 2013 Act provides for significantly enhanced compensation compared to the 1894 Act:
Determination of Market Value — Section 26 Market value is determined as the higher of:
- The market value specified in the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 for the area where the land is situated
- The average sale price for similar land in the vicinity (average of the top 50% of sale deeds registered in the last 3 years)
- The consented amount in the case of acquisitions under consent
Solatium and Multiplier: In addition to the market value, the following are added:
- 100% solatium (additional amount) on the market value — i.e., the total compensation is 2 times the market value
- For rural areas — Market value is multiplied by a factor of 1 to 2 (depending on the distance from urban areas) before adding solatium. So the total compensation can be up to 4 times the market value in rural areas.
- For urban areas — The multiplier factor is 1, so total compensation is 2 times the market value
Additional Compensation:
- Value of trees, plants, and standing crops on the acquired land
- Value of structures and buildings on the acquired land
- Damages suffered by the landowner due to the acquisition
Feature 5 — Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) — Second Schedule
The 2013 Act for the first time provides comprehensive entitlements for rehabilitation and resettlement of displaced persons. The R&R package includes:
1. Housing
- Each displaced family that is landless, agricultural labourer, or forest dweller must be provided a house
- If the family chooses not to take a house, a one-time payment of ₹1,50,000 is made
2. Employment or One-Time Payment
- One job per affected family in the project (where technically feasible)
- OR one-time payment of ₹5,00,000 per family
- OR annuity paying ₹2,000 per month per family for 20 years (indexed to inflation)
3. Subsistence Allowance ₹3,000 per month for a period of 1 year to each affected family
4. Transportation Allowance ₹50,000 per family for transportation costs
5. Resettlement Allowance ₹50,000 per family as resettlement allowance
6. Infrastructure at Resettlement Sites The government must provide the following facilities at resettlement sites:
- Roads and drainage
- Schools
- Post offices and banking facilities
- Primary health centres
- Panchayat ghars
- Drinking water facilities
- Places of worship
Feature 6 — Food Security — Section 10A
The Act contains an important provision protecting multi-crop irrigated land (land used for growing multiple crops with irrigation). The acquisition of such land can only be done as a last resort and only to a specified limited extent. This is designed to protect India's food security by preventing the conversion of productive agricultural land to non-agricultural uses.
Feature 7 — Transparency and Participation — Section 11
The 2013 Act requires the government to publish a preliminary notification (Section 11 notification) in the Official Gazette, two local newspapers (one in the regional language), and on its website. The notification must contain:
- The reason for acquisition
- The area proposed to be acquired
- The particulars of the public purpose
After the notification, objections from affected persons must be heard by the Collector before the acquisition proceeds.
Feature 8 — Gram Sabha Consultation
For acquisitions affecting tribal communities in Scheduled Areas, the Act requires the prior consent of the gram sabha (village assembly) before acquisition can proceed. This reflects the special protections available to tribal communities under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution and the PESA Act, 1996.
Feature 9 — Return of Unutilized Land — Section 101
If acquired land is not used for the stated purpose within 5 years of acquisition, the land must be:
- Returned to the original owners or their legal heirs, OR
- Transferred to the Land Bank of the government for use in another public purpose
Feature 10 — Special Provisions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes — Sections 41 and 42
The Act contains special provisions for the protection of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes:
- As far as possible, land in Scheduled Areas must not be acquired for non-tribal purposes
- Where acquisition in Scheduled Areas is unavoidable, the gram sabha must be consulted and its consent obtained
- Land acquired in Scheduled Areas must, if resold, be resold only to a Scheduled Tribe member
- A development plan must be prepared for the Scheduled Tribe communities affected by the acquisition
Feature 11 — Dispute Resolution
The Act provides for the establishment of a Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (LARR Authority) in each state for the resolution of disputes relating to compensation, rehabilitation, and resettlement. The LARR Authority has the powers of a civil court and its decisions can be appealed to the High Court.
Feature 12 — Penalties — Section 84
The Act provides for imprisonment and fine for government officials who:
- Acquire land for a purpose other than the stated public purpose
- Fail to implement the R&R provisions
- Commit any other violation of the Act
Important Case Laws
1. Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal (2020) The Supreme Court (Constitution Bench) delivered a landmark judgment clarifying the provisions relating to lapse of acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, holding that an acquisition lapses if the Collector fails to take possession within 5 years and an award has not been made.
2. Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki (2014) The Supreme Court applied the provisions of the 2013 Act to pending acquisitions and held that the enhanced compensation provisions of the 2013 Act apply to acquisitions where the award has not been made.
3. Tukaram Kana Joshi v. MIDC (2013) The Supreme Court held that the state must provide adequate compensation and rehabilitation to all persons displaced by land acquisition and that a narrow interpretation of "affected persons" violates the constitutional rights of displaced persons.
Conclusion
The RFCTLARR Act, 2013 is a landmark legislation that represents a fundamental shift in India's approach to land acquisition — from an exploitative colonial law to a rights-based framework that respects the dignity and economic rights of landowners and displaced persons. Its key features — the SIA requirement, the consent provisions, the enhanced compensation formula, and the comprehensive R&R package — collectively create a system that is far more just, transparent, and humane than the old 1894 Act. While the Act has faced criticism for slowing down infrastructure development, its fundamental contribution to the protection of the rights of India's farmers, landless labourers, and tribal communities cannot be overstated. The Act embodies India's constitutional commitment to social justice and the protection of the most vulnerable sections of society.
Comments
Post a Comment